Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Seed Proportion on Forage Yield of Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) and Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) Mixture at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center

Received: 24 May 2024     Accepted: 28 June 2024     Published: 6 August 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Establishing of grass-legume pastures is one of the recognized strategies for enhancing both quantity and quality of feed resources. Therefore, determining the impact of seed proportion on the nutritional qualities and forage yield of combinations of guinea grass and green leaf desmodium is the goal of this study. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was used to arrange five seed proportions of desmodium and guinea grass. Analysis of variance revealed that variations in treatments have significant differences (p<0.05) on panicum heights, desmodium tillers, and Desmodium height. In addition, the effects of years showed significant (p<0.05) effects on panicum tiller, desmodium height, and percentage of coverages. Interaction of treatments with years showed a significant effect on tiller per plant and plant heights while the other parameters weren’t influenced. The combined mean of dry matter and percentage of coverage have showed significant differences (p<0.05) between the treatments. This result reveals that the seed proportion have effect on the dry matter and percentage of plant coverages. The aggressivity index also has significant mean differences (P<0.05) between the treatments. Legumes with the lowest proportion (25%) performed less competently than those with the highest proportions (75%) and 50% D. intortum. The crowding coefficient of P. maximum and D. intortum mixed forage showed significance differences (P<0.05). However, the value of seed proportion on crowding coefficient of panicum maximum and desmodium intortium were more than one. The LER has significant differences (P<0.05) due to ratio of P.maximum and D.intortium mixture and its value at T2, T3, and T4 showed as to be (LER>1) that revealed the yield advantages. Cobined mean results showed that there is significance difference (P<0.05) of CP, Ash, ADF, NDF and ADL due to different seed proportion mixture. In addition the CP of panicum incurred from 8.24% to 18.55% by mixing different seed proportion of D.intortium. An integration of legume forage with grasses improves the feed quality and quantity. Thus, based on the dry matter, yield advantage and nutritive values the integration of 75% and 50% desmodium is recommended for use in the study areas and similar agro-ecologies.

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12
Page(s) 110-117
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Animal Feeds, Biomass, Dry Matter, Legumes, Nutritive Value

References
[1] Alemayehu Abebe, Afework Hagos, Habtamu Alebachew and Mulisa Faji, 2018. Determinants of adoption of improved forages in selected districts of Benishangul-Gumuz, Western Ethiopia.
[2] Alemayehu Mengistu, Gezehagn Kebede, GetnetAssefa, Fekede Feyissa, 2016. Improved forage crops production strategies in Ethiopia: A review. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res. 4(6): 285-296.
[3] Alemayehu M, 2012. Keynote address. In: Getnet Assefa, Mesfin Dejene, Jean Hanson, Getachew Anemut, Solomon Mengistu And Alemayehu Mengistu (eds), Forage seed research and development in Ethiopia. Ethiopia institute of agricultural research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp 3-5.
[4] Alemayehu M. 2002. Forage production in Ethiopia: A case study with implication for livestock production. Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[5] Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC), 1990. Official Method of Analysis, 16thEdn. Arlington, Virginia USA.
[6] B. K. Trivedi, 2003. GRASSES 'AND LEGUMES FOR TROPICAL PASTURES. Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi - 284 003, India.
[7] Dawit Abate, Meseret Tilahun, Nebi Husen and Daniel Wana, 2021. Effect of Seeding Ratios of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Rhodes Grass (Chloris gayana) Mixtures on Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Quality of the Fodder in Proceedings of review Workshop on Completed Research Activities of Livestock Research Directorate held at Batu Fisheries and Other Aquatic Resources Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia, 15-20 November 2021.
[8] De Wit, C. T. Van and J. P. Bergh, 1965. Competition among herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 14: 186-2011.
[9] De Wit C. T. (1960) On competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundige Onderzoekigen, 66, 1–82.
[10] Gulwa U, Mgujulwa N and Beyene ST, 2017. Effect of Grass-legume intercropping on Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Value of Pastures in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 5(6): 355-362.
[11] ILRI, 2013. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) for livestock feed on small-scale farms. ILRI Forage Factsheet.
[12] Kefyalew Gebeyew, Diriba Diba, Kibru Beriso, Sisay Fikiru and Abshir Omer, 2018. Forage Yield, Compatibility and Nutrient Content of Panicum antidotale and Desmodium uncinatum Mixed Pasture under Rainfed Conditions in Jigjiga District, Somali Regional State Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 18(5): 239-245.
[13] McGilchrist, C. A. and B. R. Trenbath, 1971. A review analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics, 27: 629-671.
[14] Man and Wiktorsson, 2003. Forage yield, nutritive value, feed intake and digestibility of three grass species as affected by harvest frequency Tropical Grasslands 37(2): 101-110.
[15] Mead, R. and R. W. Willey, 1980. The concept of land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields for intercropping. Exp. Agric, 16: 217-228.
[16] Muhammad Rusdy, 2014. Dry matter yield and nutritional quality of panicum maximum – centrosema pubescens mixtures at different plant proportions and cutting intervals. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 3, No 6, 2231–2241.
[17] Tekalign, E. 2014. Forage seed systems in Ethiopia: A scoping study. ILRI Project Report. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
[18] Tessema Z. and Baars, R. M. T., 2008. Chemical composition, dry matter production and yield dynamics of tropical grasses mixed with perennial forage legumes. Tropical Grasslands, Volume 40, 150–156.
[19] Uwe Ohmstedt and Solomon Mwendia, 2018. Tropical Forages Factsheets. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT),
[20] Unathi Gulwa, Nobulungisa Mgujulwa and Solomon T. Beyene. 2018. Benefits of grass-legume inter-cropping in livestock systems. African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 13(26), pp. 1311-1319,
[21] Van Soest, P. J. and J. B. Robinson, 1985. Analysis of Forage and Fibrous Foods. A Laboratory Manual for Animal Science 613, Cornell University, U.S.A, pp: 258.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tilahun, M., Husein, N., Abate, D. (2024). Effects of Seed Proportion on Forage Yield of Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) and Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) Mixture at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. American Journal of BioScience, 12(4), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tilahun, M.; Husein, N.; Abate, D. Effects of Seed Proportion on Forage Yield of Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) and Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) Mixture at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Am. J. BioScience 2024, 12(4), 110-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tilahun M, Husein N, Abate D. Effects of Seed Proportion on Forage Yield of Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) and Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) Mixture at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Am J BioScience. 2024;12(4):110-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12,
      author = {Meseret Tilahun and Nabi Husein and Dawit Abate},
      title = {Effects of Seed Proportion on Forage Yield of Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) and Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) Mixture at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center
    },
      journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {110-117},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20241204.12},
      abstract = {Establishing of grass-legume pastures is one of the recognized strategies for enhancing both quantity and quality of feed resources. Therefore, determining the impact of seed proportion on the nutritional qualities and forage yield of combinations of guinea grass and green leaf desmodium is the goal of this study. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was used to arrange five seed proportions of desmodium and guinea grass. Analysis of variance revealed that variations in treatments have significant differences (p1) that revealed the yield advantages. Cobined mean results showed that there is significance difference (P<0.05) of CP, Ash, ADF, NDF and ADL due to different seed proportion mixture. In addition the CP of panicum incurred from 8.24% to 18.55% by mixing different seed proportion of D.intortium. An integration of legume forage with grasses improves the feed quality and quantity. Thus, based on the dry matter, yield advantage and nutritive values the integration of 75% and 50% desmodium is recommended for use in the study areas and similar agro-ecologies.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Seed Proportion on Forage Yield of Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) and Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) Mixture at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center
    
    AU  - Meseret Tilahun
    AU  - Nabi Husein
    AU  - Dawit Abate
    Y1  - 2024/08/06
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12
    T2  - American Journal of BioScience
    JF  - American Journal of BioScience
    JO  - American Journal of BioScience
    SP  - 110
    EP  - 117
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0167
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20241204.12
    AB  - Establishing of grass-legume pastures is one of the recognized strategies for enhancing both quantity and quality of feed resources. Therefore, determining the impact of seed proportion on the nutritional qualities and forage yield of combinations of guinea grass and green leaf desmodium is the goal of this study. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was used to arrange five seed proportions of desmodium and guinea grass. Analysis of variance revealed that variations in treatments have significant differences (p1) that revealed the yield advantages. Cobined mean results showed that there is significance difference (P<0.05) of CP, Ash, ADF, NDF and ADL due to different seed proportion mixture. In addition the CP of panicum incurred from 8.24% to 18.55% by mixing different seed proportion of D.intortium. An integration of legume forage with grasses improves the feed quality and quantity. Thus, based on the dry matter, yield advantage and nutritive values the integration of 75% and 50% desmodium is recommended for use in the study areas and similar agro-ecologies.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Animal Feed Resources and Rangeland Management, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Animal Feed Resources and Rangeland Management, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Animal Feed Resources and Rangeland Management, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Sections